Wedding agreements perform usually suggest the timeframe into the and this amarriage must took put
1. But really, within the genealogy, each of us knowthat for every rule discover an exemption. A vexing point ofgenealogy is that no-one really understands exactly how to use the brand new exceptions orrules which have people decisive adjective such usually, perhaps, most likely,almost certainly, etcetera. It would be interesting if truth be told there almost every other advice ofjointures are produced a-year or two just after a known relationships go out.
2. Will there be an extant dispensation on marriage regarding ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes have been 3rd cousins thru Henry Fitzhugh,3rd Lord Fitzhugh or 4th cousins, immediately following taken from this new fifth LordClifford? Who narrow down their matrimony big date.
Arthur
Allegedly, if a dispensation try sought and granted, it can havebeen of the among following the, and can even appear in brand new correspondingregister guide, if it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop off York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop of Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop out-of York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop from Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop off Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop off Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In the event the 10th Lord Clifford do get married at the beginning of 1487 [say January] andhas Elizabeth later in that season, do the fresh chronology perhaps not performs?
John possession?
Elizabeth created from inside the late 1487, Henry born during the 1488/nine, Joan for the ,etcetera. filling in brand new brands of your publish off . If the (a) thechronology still really works; and (b) their own matrimony piece was not low; thenwe just have new 1505 pedigree off Henry VII’s which is during the oppositionto brand new supposition that she is a legitimate daughter.
six. About your 1505 pedigree: Are the Clifford daughters the newest onlyknown Henry VII relationships omitted? Are there anyone else? If that’s the case,won’t one reflect defectively with this file given that a source?
Regarding evaluations I’ve made of brand new c.1505 Henry VII Affairs pedigreeswith this new 1480-1500 Visitation of the North pedigrees, being
In the c.1505 Connections pedigrees, the brand new Clifford children are perhaps not listedin an excellent Clifford pedigree, but alternatively throughout the St. John pedigree. Once the I’mnot regularly this new St. John family unit members, pursuing the is the pointers asit looks in the c.1505 pedigree, as the obtained from the 1834 Coll. Finest. etGen. blog post. The brand new phrasing inside the quotations is exactly because looks inthe 1834 post (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”Away from my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, together with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess of Somerset had three husbands.” By the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Lady the latest King’s Mommy.” who’d “The brand new King.” whohad “Prince “Of the “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first partner.” she got step three daus & dos sons:
A beneficial. “Edith, married so you can Geoffrey Pole regarding Buckinghamshire.” That they had:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. married towards the Lady Margaret https://kissbrides.com/sv/chilenska-kvinnor/, dau. off theDuke from Clarence.” They had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married in order to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [child, unnamed]. ——-[a unique youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq.” He previously four students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Five daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. to help you Harry Lord Clifford.” They had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and you can heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “Elizabeth, wedded in order to Thomas Kent, Esq. out-of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A Nun of Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall with his brethren and sistren.” Which have issueindicated, however named.C2. “Age, wedded in order to Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Age, wedded basic for the Lord Zouche; immediately following to your LordScrope from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [by Zouche] ” Catesby.” They’d:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [by Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated although not called.
Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, by “Lionel Lord Welles, past spouse.”had: “John Viscount Welles, married Cecily, dau. out-of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Elizabeth.”
